1. Xxzxx’s Kongregate profile - Check out xxzxx’s favorite free games and achievements.
2. Volume 222 Pages 1-1032 (May 2019) Previous vol/issue. Next vol/issue. Actions for selected articles. Select all / Deselect all. Download PDFs Export citations. Show all article previews Show all article previews. Minor and rare earth elements in decomposing litter in a cool temperate ecosystem, South Korea.

• Ruth Sanger

• About this Journal ·
• Abstracting and Indexing ·
• Aims and Scope ·
• Article Processing Charges ·
• Bibliographic Information ·
• Editorial Board ·
• Editorial Workflow ·
• Publication Ethics ·
• Reviewer Resources ·
• Submit a Manuscript ·
• Subscription Information ·

Vintage Collection - Gilbert & Sullivan: Iolanthe. By Sullivan, Arthur on CD. Order from your preferred classical music CD store - ArkivMusic. Great prices. Best service.

• Open Special Issues ·

Gestational Trophoblastic Disease: A Multimodality Imaging Approach with Impact on Diagnosis and Management

¹Department of Diagnostic Imaging, National University Hospital, Level 2, Main Building, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119074
²Tata Memorial Hospital, Dr. E. Borges Marg, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400012, India

Received 18 February 2014; Accepted 28 June 2014; Published 13 July 2014

Academic Editor: Andreas H. Mahnken

Copyright © 2014 Sunita Dhanda et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Gestational trophoblastic disease is a condition of uncertain etiology, comprised of hydatiform mole (complete and partial), invasive mole, choriocarcinoma, and placental site trophoblastic tumor. It arises from abnormal proliferation of trophoblastic tissue. Early diagnosis of gestational trophoblastic disease and its potential complications is important for timely and successful management of the condition with preservation of fertility. Initial diagnosis is based on a multimodality approach: encompassing clinical features, serial quantitative β-hCG titers, and pelvic ultrasonography. Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is sometimes used as a problem-solving tool to assess the depth of myometrial invasion and extrauterine disease spread in equivocal and complicated cases. Chest radiography, body computed tomography (CT), and brain MRI have been recommended as investigative tools for overall disease staging. Angiography has a role in management of disease complications and metastases. Efficacy of PET (positron emission tomography) and PET/CT in the evaluation of recurrent or metastatic disease has not been adequately investigated yet. This paper discusses the imaging features of gestational trophoblastic disease on various imaging modalities and the role of different imaging techniques in the diagnosis and management of this entity.

1. Introduction

Gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD) refers to an abnormal trophoblastic proliferation composed of a broad spectrum of lesions ranging from benign, albeit premalignant hydatiform mole (complete and partial), through to the aggressive invasive mole, choriocarcinoma, and placental site trophoblastic tumor (PSTT). Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) refers to the aggressive subset that has a capability for independent growth and metastases and requires chemotherapy. It includes invasive mole, choriocarcinoma, and PSTT. GTN may arise following evacuation of a molar pregnancy as well as after a normal term or preterm pregnancy, abortion, or ectopic pregnancy. Hence, it is also referred to as persistent trophoblastic neoplasia (PTN). These lesions vary considerably in clinicopathologic behavior and propensity for local invasion and metastases. Although GTD may occur as a pregnancy complication in women of any age, it is more common at teenage or advanced maternal age (40–50 years) [1, 2]. Early detection of GTN is important as it has an excellent prognosis following treatment due to exquisite chemosensitivity of most of these lesions [1, 2]. In this paper, we describe the role of various imaging techniques in the diagnosis and management of GTD. A brief overview of the underlying pathophysiology, clinical features, classification, and posttreatment surveillance of the disease is also provided.

2. Pathophysiology

Trophoblast is a gestational tissue which covers the blastocyst and provides route for nourishment between the maternal endometrium and the developing embryo in early pregnancy. Ultimately, it covers the surface of chorionic villi and forms the fetal portion of the placenta. Trophoblast is comprised of cytotrophoblast, syncytiotrophoblast, and intermediate trophoblast. Cytotrophoblast shows high mitotic activity; however, it lacks hormone synthesis. Syncytiotrophoblast forms the chorionic villi, has low mitotic activity, and synthesizes beta-human chorionic gonadotrophin (β-hCG), which is used as a tumor marker. Intermediate trophoblast has features of the other two components and is responsible for endometrial invasion and implantation. In the various forms of GTD, different components of trophoblast show abnormal proliferation to a variable extent [1]. Although most GTNs secrete β-hCG hormone with abnormal elevation of β-hCG titers being one of their diagnostic features of GTD, the titers vary in different tumor types. Some choriocarcinomas and bimorphic tumor types secrete only low levels of β-hCG [3]. PSTT represents a neoplastic proliferation of intermediate trophoblasts [2]. Unlike other forms of GTD, it is characterized by low β-hCG levels due to lack of syncytiotrophoblastic proliferation [2–4]. However, it shows increased expression of tissue as well as serum human placental lactogen (hPL) [4].

Hydatiform mole results from an aberrant fertilization process. It includes complete and partial mole, the former being more common. Complete hydatiform mole arises when a single haploid sperm (23X) fertilizes a chromosomally empty ovum followed by chromosomal duplication and formation of a zygote with no maternal contribution. This leads to a genetically diploid pattern (more commonly 46XX) in a complete mole. Similar fertilization and duplication with a 23Y sperm do not produce a viable (46YY) zygote. Rarely, 46XY pattern may result due to fertilization of a chromosomally empty ovum by two different sperms. In contrast, partial hydatiform mole usually has a triploid chromosomal pattern (46XXX, 46XXY, and 46XYY), resulting from fertilization of a normal egg by two sperms [1, 2, 5, 6].

Pathologically, hydatiform mole is composed of abnormally proliferating syncytiotrophoblastic and cytotrophoblastic cells resulting in generalized swelling of chorionic villi. Complete mole shows severe villous swelling, resembling a bunch of grapes and usually an absence of embryo. Villous swelling is less intense in a partial mole and an embryo is usually present. The embryo may survive up to early second trimester [1, 2]. Complete or partial hydatiform mole invading the myometrium is called invasive mole. Hydatiform mole is a premalignant condition with 16% of complete and 0.5% partial moles undergoing transformation into malignant forms (invasive mole, choriocarcinoma, or PSTT) [1, 2]. Choriocarcinoma consists of malignant proliferation of cytotrophoblast and syncytiotrophoblast in various proportions; however, it is histopathologically distinct from invasive mole in that it lacks chorionic villous formations. It may arise following hydatiform mole, term pregnancy, miscarriage, or ectopic pregnancy. Choriocarcinoma is a highly malignant, necrotic, hemorrhagic, and locally invasive form of GTN. Early and extensive vascular invasion results in metastases even when the primary tumor is quite small [1, 2]. Choriocarcinoma arising after miscarriage or term pregnancy may present after several years, directly as metastases, elevated β-hCG levels, and normal pelvic sonography findings [2, 6]. PSTT is the rarest form of GTN with uncertain biological behavior [2, 4, 7]. It arises from the placental implantation site following a normal pregnancy, abortion, or hydatiform mole, most commonly from an antecedent normal pregnancy. It is generally a slow growing tumor with a tendency for local and lymph nodal metastases before distant metastases (a very rare feature in choriocarcinoma) [2].

3. Clinical and Laboratory Features

Initial diagnosis of GTD is based on a combination of history, examination, quantitative β-hCG titers, and pelvic sonography. Diagnosis of hydatiform mole based on clinical features may be difficult due to nonspecificity of signs and symptoms. Patients present with irregular vaginal bleeding, excessive vomiting, transvaginal expulsion of grape-like vesicles, abnormally enlarged uterus, and features of preeclampsia, anemia, or hyperthyroidism [1, 5, 8]. β-hCG levels show large variation in normal, multiple, and abnormal gestations and when considered in isolation may be misleading for diagnosis of hydatiform mole. Hence, early first trimester sonography remains the investigation of choice for initial diagnosis of hydatiform mole [1, 8].

The standard treatment for hydatiform form is suction evacuation, resulting in approximately 84% cure rate for complete moles and 99.5% for partial moles [1, 2]. It is difficult to predict patient outcome at the time of initial diagnosis. Hence, all patients are followed up with serial quantitative serum β-hCG measurements following suction evacuation, to allow early diagnosis of persistent trophoblastic neoplasia [1, 5, 9]. β-hCG levels should decline following suction evacuation. As per the latest FIGO guidelines [10], posthydatiform mole GTN may be diagnosed based on any of the following criteria:(1)β-hCG level plateau for 4 measurements over a period of 3 weeks or longer, that is, for days 1, 7, 14, and 21;(2)a rise in β-hCG levels for 3 consecutive measurements or longer over a period of at least 2 weeks or more, that is, on days 1, 7, and 14;(3)histological diagnosis of choriocarcinoma;(4)elevated β-hCG levels for 6 months or more after evacuation.Although β-hCG is useful for diagnosis of PTN, imaging studies may play a confirmatory role in early disease or patients with confusing clinical picture. The most important role of ultrasound in patients with suspected PTN is to exclude a normal gestation as a cause of elevated β-hCG level [1].

Nonmetastatic GTN presents as a localized uterine tumor with abnormal vaginal bleeding. Uterine perforation may result in intraperitoneal bleed, presenting as an acute abdomen. Metastases have been reported in 19% of cases, most commonly from choriocarcinoma [2]. Hematogenous dissemination is the principal route of spread, most commonly to lung (80%) followed by vagina (30%), brain (10%), and liver (10%). It may also metastasize to kidney, gastrointestinal tract, skin, or fetus (from choriocarcinoma). Isolated metastasis to other sites is rare in the absence of lung and vaginal metastases [2, 6, 9]. Hypervascular metastases may present with features of hemorrhage. Lung metastases may be asymptomatic or present with hemoptysis, dyspnea, chest pain, or pulmonary artery hypertension. Vaginal metastases may result in torrential vaginal bleeding. Hence, a biopsy should be avoided. Brain metastases may present with headache, seizures, motor, or sensory deficit. Liver metastases are usually asymptomatic [2, 9].

4. Imaging Features of the Uterine Disease

4.1. Ultrasound

Grey-scale ultrasound with color and spectral Doppler imaging is a very useful tool for diagnosing GTD, determining presence of invasive disease, predicting response to chemotherapy, postchemotherapy follow-up, and detection of recurrence [2, 6].

4.1.1. Ultrasonographic Features of Hydatiform Mole

Ultrasound is the first line imaging investigation for diagnosis of a clinically suspected hydatiform mole since a single abnormally elevated serum β-hCG level measured at the time of patient presentation is not diagnostic and may be seen in a multiple gestation as well [2, 6, 8, 11, 12]. Pelvic sonography is performed as a routine investigation during early pregnancy to accurately date the gestation and determine any abnormalities [6, 11]. Ultrasound can be done by transabdominal or transvaginal approach. Transvaginal sonography provides better details of the lesion due to its superior spatial resolution and proximity to the anatomy of interest. On the contrary, transabdominal approach needs the patient to hold urine resulting in patient discomfort and provides fewer details. On first trimester transabdominal ultrasound, hydatiform mole which constitutes 80% cases of GTD will be seen most frequently as an enlarged uterus with a heterogeneous endometrial mass of variable echogenicity (predominantly echogenic) [1, 2, 6, 12]. Ultrasound appearance of the lesion has been classically described earlier as “snowstorm” or “granular” due to multiple echogenic foci [1]. Transvaginal sonography (TVS) can better demonstrate the lesion morphology and any myometrial invasion. Fluid-filled molar vesicles, representing hydropic, and swollen villi are typically seen as multiple small anechoic spaces varying in size from 1–30 mm throughout the lesion on first trimester transvaginal sonography (Figure 1). With increasing gestational age, the anechoic spaces become larger and more numerous due to presence of prominent villi, making sonographic diagnosis of hydatiform mole easier in second trimester than in the first trimester even by transabdominal approach [2, 6]. Uterine volume should also be accurately estimated on ultrasound as it correlates with the tumor burden and hence determines risk stratification [2].

A fetus or fetal parts are not seen in a complete hydatiform mole except in 1-2% of cases with coexistent dizygotic diploid twin pregnancy [1]. In contrast, partial mole is usually associated with a fetus which is growth retarded or anomalous and an enlarged, thickened placenta with numerous anechoic cystic lesions. A dizygotic diploid twin pregnancy coexistent with a complete mole can be differentiated from a triploid partial mole on ultrasound by identifying a separate normal placenta in the former [1, 2, 6]. Placental appearance similar to partial mole may result from hydropic placental degeneration associated with first trimester embryonic demise of any cause [2, 6].

Differentiation of the complete and partial moles can be difficult but is of limited clinical significance, as the management is similar [6].

Although ultrasound is very useful for suggesting a molar pregnancy, final diagnosis still rests with the pathology [2]. Ultrasound finding of a heterogeneous endometrial mass is nonspecific and may also be seen in retained products of conception [2, 8]. Sometimes, it may appear as a large, central fluid collection, mimicking an anembryonic gestation or miscarriage (Figure 2) [1]. However, correlation with clinical features and β-hCG will be useful in making the distinction.

Ruth Sanger

Ovaries may show theca lutein cysts due to hyperstimulation by high circulating gonadotropin levels in up to 40% of cases. The cysts are multilocular and usually bilateral. Rarely, these may hemorrhage or rupture leading to an acute abdomen. They usually resolve within a few months after treatment of the intrauterine process [1]. Cmi9761a audio driver download xp.

4.1.2. Ultrasonographic Features of Invasive Disease (GTN)

Myometrial invasion is best appreciated on TVS due to superior demonstration of the interface between trophoblastic tissue and myometrium [2]. Invasive mole, choriocarcinoma, and PSTT are seen on grey-scale ultrasound as nonspecific focal masses (Figures 3(a)–3(f)) with myometrial epicenter and are sonographically indistinguishable from one another. The mass may be echogenic, hypoechoic, complex, or multicystic. It may show anechoic spaces which represent hemorrhage, necrosis, cysts, or vascular spaces. More extensive disease may appear as a heterogeneously enlarged uterus with lobulated contour or large pelvic mass which may extend to involve other pelvic organs (Figure 3(g)) [12]. These masses may be potentially confused with fibroids or adenomyosis. Adenomyosis typically appears as a diffuse disease process causing enlarged uterus with a diffuse heterogeneous echo texture. It can also manifest as asymmetrical myometrial thickening, myometrial cysts, indistinct endometrial-myometrial junction, polyploid lesion, or focal mass within the myometrium with poorly defined margins that blend with the surrounding myometrium. Typical fibroid usually presents as a well-circumscribed hypoechoic myometrial lesion, although echogenicity may vary. The various ultrasound presentations of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia may overlap with these imaging findings of fibroids and adenomyosis. However, correlation with serum β-hCG levels, clinical history, and lack of extreme vascularity on Doppler sonography aid in their differentiation [12, 13].

Persistent trophoblastic neoplasia is presumed to be invasive mole unless there is presence of metastases to suggest choriocarcinoma. Since both invasive mole and choriocarcinoma are usually treated with chemotherapy, histological differentiation of the two types is not needed routinely [1]. With effective chemotherapy, the lesions usually become progressively smaller and hypoechoic on ultrasound [12]. However, differentiation of PSTT from invasive mole or choriocarcinoma is important because it is relatively chemoresistant and often requires hysterectomy for treatment [2, 6]. Although invasive mole, choriocarcinoma and PSTT are indistinguishable sonographically, the diagnosis of PSTT is strongly suggested when there are sonographic features of GTN with very low levels of β-hCG [6].

4.1.3. Role of Doppler Imaging

Color flow and spectral Doppler are routinely performed in addition to grey-scale ultrasound for diagnosis of the primary or recurrent GTD and posttreatment follow-up. In a normal pregnancy, first trimester Doppler study of the intrauterine arteries shows high resistance flow with low diastolic velocities except at the implantation site [2, 6]. The flow resistance reduces in the second and third trimesters with increasing physiological arterial invasion by trophoblastic tissue. In contrast, molar pregnancy shows high velocity, low impedance waveforms in the first and early second trimesters themselves due to high degree of arterial invasion by abnormally proliferating trophoblast. Arterio-venous shunts associated with neovascularization within the invasive myometrial mass result in an appearance of chaotic vasculature with color aliasing and loss of vascular discreteness on Color Doppler imaging (Figure 4). This extreme vascularity appears as high velocity and low impedance flow [2, 6, 12]. Vascular impedance can be quantified using indices derived from the uterine artery waveform known as pulsatility index (PI) and resistive index (RI). High resistance flow produces high PI and RI, and vice versa. Although there are no unanimously agreed cut-off values for these indices, an RI of less than 0.4 and a PI of less than 1.5 indicative of low uterine artery resistance have been observed in gestational trophoblastic neoplasia [2, 14, 15]. Doppler ultrasound can help determine presence of invasive disease by demonstrating extension of this abnormal vascularity into the myometrium [6].

These Doppler ultrasound features may also be seen due to any cause of increased pelvic blood flow such as retained products of conception, ectopic pregnancy, pelvic inflammation, nontrophoblastic pelvic malignancy, or uterine arterio-venous malformation [12]. Zhou et al. [14] observed lower resistive indices (RI) in invasive mole and choriocarcinoma than complete or partial hydatiform mole indicative of greater degree of vascular invasion in the first two.

PSTT may be hypovascular or hypervascular, with the former form being not associated with prominent vascularity on Doppler ultrasound [2, 12].

Studies by Long et al. [16] and Agarwal et al. [15] have suggested PI to be a potential surrogate marker to predict response of GTN to chemotherapy. Patients with low pulsatility index (PI) have been shown to be more likely to become chemoresistant to single drug therapy with methotrexate.

Recently published studies by Agarwal et al. [17] and Sita-Lumsden [18] have revalidated the usefulness of uterine artery PI (UAPI) as a predictor of methotrexate resistance (MTX-R) independent of Charing Cross Hospital and FIGO scores. The risk of MTX-R in patients with a FIGO score of 6 and UAPI was shown to be 100% versus 20% in patients with ( ) by Agarwal et al. Sita-Lumsden et al. showed that UAPI ≤ 1 predicted MTX-R independent of the FIGO score (hazard ratio 2.9, ), with an absolute risk of MTX-R in women with a UAPI ≤ 1 of 67% (95% CI 53–79%) compared with 42% (95% CI 24–61%) with a UAPI > 1 ().

Doppler ultrasound also has a potential for following disease response to chemotherapy. Cystic vascular spaces in the myometrial mass of invasive disease show regression during successful chemotherapy. These changes follow decline in serum β-hCG levels [2, 6].

GTN is the commonest cause of uterine vascular malformations (arterio-venous shunts and pseudoaneurysms) and Doppler ultrasound can be a useful tool for demonstrating them (Figures 5 and 6) [2, 6, 19]. These vascular abnormalities may persist in up to 15% of cases following complete response to chemotherapy as a result of residual scarring. These are not considered to be significant if asymptomatic and associated with normal serum and urinary β-hCG levels. The abnormalities may regress spontaneously on follow-up imaging. However, rising β-hCG levels should prompt search for a recurrent GTN with whole-body imaging [2].

4.2. Computed Tomography (CT)

CT is principally used for detection of metastatic disease (discussed in a later section). Uterine disease is seen as an enlarged uterus with focal irregular low attenuation lesions (Figure 7) on CT pelvis, which may also demonstrate bilateral ovarian enlargement with multiple theca lutein cysts. Parametrial disease spread is seen as enhancing tissue in this region (Figure 8) [2]. CT can also identify vascular malformations resulting from GTN (Figure 6(c)) [20].

4.3. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

MRI does not have a role in routine assessment of pelvic disease. It is sometimes used as a problem-solving tool to assess the depth of myometrial invasion and extrauterine disease spread in equivocal and complicated cases, suspected PSTT, and recurrent GTN [1, 2]. MRI appearance of molar pregnancy can be relatively nonspecific and difficult to distinguish from retained products of conception or ectopic pregnancy [21, 22]. First trimester MRI may reveal little or no abnormality. In the second trimester, hydatiform mole is visualized as a heterogeneously hyperintense tumor distorting the normal zonal architecture on T2-weighted images which may show numerous characteristic cystic spaces. It causes uterine enlargement and distension of the endometrial cavity with indistinct boundary between the endometrium and myometrium. On T1-weighted images, it is isointense or mildly hyperintense to the myometrium with areas of hemorrhage, seen as focal signal hyperintensity [23, 24]. Diffuse myometrial involvement by the tumor is seen as diffuse myometrial signal hyperintensity with obliteration of the normal zonal anatomy. Invasive GTN has similar signal characteristics however with a myometrial epicenter (Figure 9), invasion into parametrium (Figure 10), and more frequent hemorrhage and necrosis [23]. MRI is superior to ultrasound for identification of parametrial invasion, which is seen as heterogeneous T2 hyperintense masses beyond the confines of the uterus (Figure 10) [2, 25].

On contrast enhanced dynamic MRI, viable trophoblastic tissue with surrounding inflammatory response is seen as marked enhancement on early arterial phase [26]. Tumor hypervascularity is also seen as prominent tortuous flow voids in the tumor and adjoining myometrium, parametrium, and adnexae on both T1 and T2-weighted images with engorgement of internal iliac and arcuate vessels with respect to the external iliac artery (Figure 9) [24]. However, the hypovascular form of PSTT has been demonstrated to be hyperintense to myometrium on both T1- and T2-weighted images with absence of prominent vascularity or flow voids and poor enhancement on postcontrast images [2].

With successful treatment, uterine volume and tumor hypervascularity decrease with restoration of normal zonal anatomy on T2-weighted images and reduction of heterogeneous appearance (Figure 10). Intralesional hemorrhage may occur (Figure 10(c)). MRI findings usually normalize at 6–9 months following effective chemotherapy. Persistent uterine vascular malformations are seen as residual tortuous and coiled vessels within a thickened myometrium [2, 20, 24].

Bulky necrotic trophoblastic tissue in the uterine wall may serve as a nidus for infection and cause severe uterine sepsis. If untreated, GTN may penetrate into myometrium with resultant uterine perforation and serious intraperitoneal hemorrhage (Figure 11) [6].

4.4. Conventional Angiography

Although color Doppler ultrasound is the modality of choice for diagnosing uterine vascular malformations, angiography is the preferred method in patients who may potentially undergo embolization for management of the vascular malformations persisting despite complete response to chemotherapy and complicated by refractory, life threatening vaginal, or intraperitoneal hemorrhage (seen in only 2% of cases) [19, 27]. Traditionally, these cases have been managed surgically with uterine artery ligation or hysterectomy. However, selective uterine artery catheterization and embolization are a safe and effective alternative treatment with preservation of fertility in these patients of reproductive age group (Figure 12) [2, 6, 19, 27]. Therapeutic target is 80% or more reduction in the size of the malformation [27]. Repeated embolotherapy may be required for recurrent bleeding [6]. Chances of uterine infarction are low due to extensive pelvic collateralization [2]. Pain requiring opiate analgesia is a frequent complication of treatment [27].

Other indications for conventional angiography in GTN include selective embolization of isolated vaginal metastases and chemoembolization of hepatic metastases. Angiography characteristically demonstrates the hepatic metastasis as a hypervascular mass with aneurysmal dilatation of peripheral ends of hepatic arteries in the arterial phase and persistent vascular lakes in the venous phase [2].

4.5. Metastatic Work-Up

CT scan is more sensitive than chest radiograph for diagnosing lung metastases. Parenchymal lung metastases are seen as multiple, rounded, soft tissue density lesions, usually up to 3 cm in size. The lesions may be solitary, miliary and may rarely show cavitation. A large amount of trophoblastic tissue embolized into the pulmonary vasculature may result in features of acute pulmonary artery hypertension. CT may demonstrate large intravascular tumor thrombus and resultant lung infarct. Both parenchymal and intravascular metastases may show hemorrhage due to their hypervascular nature, resulting in air space shadowing or ground glass opacity (Figure 13(a)). Less common endobronchial tumors may present with endobronchial obstruction. Pleural effusion may result from bleeding of lung nodules into pleural space [2].

Asymptomatic patients without lung metastases are unlikely to have brain metastases and do not require brain MRI or CT. However, patients with known lung or vaginal metastases are at significant risk of central nervous system involvement and should be screened with MRI or CT to exclude brain metastases [2, 9]. Brain metastases are usually multiple, located at grey-white matter junction, and associated with hemorrhage and surrounding edema. Due to hemorrhage, the lesions appear hyperdense on unenhanced CT (Figure 13(b)) and show variable signal intensity on MRI depending on the age of the intralesional hemorrhage. Owing to their hypervascular nature, the lesions usually enhance well [1, 2, 12].

Vaginal disease usually results from contiguous spread from the uterine lesion. Vaginal metastases are usually evaluated with MRI which demonstrates T2 hyperintense vaginal wall lesion with indistinct margins (Figure 14) [2, 24]. Isolated vaginal metastases may be effectively managed with selective embolization [2].

Liver metastases mark poor prognosis and occur later in the course of disease. Ultrasound screening of the liver may be carried out at the time of pelvic assessment. However, patients with known lung or vaginal metastases or high risk factors should be staged with CT abdomen. Liver metastases are typically seen as multiple hypervascular lesions on both CT and MRI, showing avid contrast enhancement in the arterial phase and sometimes hemorrhagic transformation. These are indistinguishable from other hypervascular hepatic tumors on CT and should never be biopsied due to a risk of fatal hemorrhage [2].

Potential role of FDG PET (18-fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography) and PET/CT in the evaluation of recurrent or metastatic disease is a topic of active interest. Preliminary studies suggest that FDG PET is potentially useful in providing precise mapping of metastases and tumour extent, monitoring treatment response, and detecting recurrent or residual disease after chemotherapy. It may be used as problem-solving tool in cases with diagnostic ambiguity on conventional imaging techniques and laboratory tests. However, careful evaluation in combination with other imaging modalities needs to be done to reduce the risk of false positive and negative results [28–33].

4.6. Staging and Classification of GTN with Impact on Management

Various staging systems and classifications based on morphology, anatomy, and clinical prognostic scoring of GTN are followed across the world. No single system has gained a universal acceptance. Treatment selection criteria are not uniform everywhere [34–45]. In order to address these issues, the International Society for the Study of Trophoblastic diseases, the International Gynecologic Cancer Society, and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) recommended a new FIGO staging (Table 1(a)) and risk scoring system (Table 1(b)) for GTN after much deliberation and discussions. This is comprised of a combination of basic FIGO stages and simplified WHO scoring system which was adopted in 2000 [3, 9].

Chemotherapy is the mainstay of the management of invasive mole and choriocarcinoma due to exquisite chemosensitivity of most of these lesions, especially if detected early and classified correctly [1–3, 6]. It has been suggested that low risk groups (WHO score ≤ 6) should be managed with a single agent chemotherapy (methotrexate or actinomycin-D) to maximize the cure rates while minimizing toxicity [3, 9, 46–48]. The treatment of choice for high-risk group is combination chemotherapy. Currently, the most widely used combination is EMA-CO (etoposide, methotrexate, actinomycin-D, cyclophosphamide, and vincristine) [3, 9, 49, 50]. Appropriate management results in overall high cure rates (100% for low risk and 80–90% for high-risk group) [2, 9].

4.7. Posttreatment Follow-Up

After completion of chemotherapy and normalization of β-hCG levels, patients are followed up with serial β-hCG levels for one year, although follow-up protocols vary at different institutes [2, 9]. Contraception should be maintained during this period to optimize the chance of detecting a relapse, thus allowing prompt treatment, and to allow DNA repair or apoptosis of the developing ova, potentially damaged by the teratogenic effect of chemotherapy [2, 9]. Follow-up imaging after chemotherapy is performed in case of a rise in β-hCG levels to differentiate a normal gestation from disease relapse and to diagnose any complications. Vast majority of patients of GTN treated with chemotherapy can anticipate normal reproductive function [2, 9, 51–53]. Subsequent pregnancy should be evaluated with early ultrasound to confirm normality. β-hCG levels should be obtained at 6 and 12 weeks after the subsequent pregnancy [2, 9, 52] to exclude occult trophoblastic disease. Also, patients should be warned against possibility of an early menopause and risk of developing second tumors, such as acute myeloid leukemia (reported with etoposide) as an adverse effect of chemotherapy [9].

5. Conclusion

Radiologist plays a key role in the initial diagnosis of GTD and guiding disease management and early detection of its complications. Although serum β-hCG is a useful biochemical marker for GTD, it is not diagnostic when considered in isolation. Ultrasound is the first line radiological investigation in confirming the diagnosis of GTD in a case suspected on the basis of clinical findings and β-hCG levels. Ultrasound in combination with Doppler is also a useful tool for diagnosing invasive disease, assessing treatment response, and detecting local recurrence. MRI is invaluable to assess extrauterine disease spread and complications. Chest radiograph, brain MRI, and body CT are primarily used to rule out metastatic disease. Conventional angiography can be used to manage patients with heavy bleeding or for chemoembolization of hepatic metastases. PET/CT is fast emerging as a promising tool for disease mapping, monitoring treatment response, and identifying recurrent or residual disease after chemotherapy. Prudent use of these imaging techniques permits early diagnosis and appropriate management, contributing to excellent cure rates of the disease.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declared no conflict of interests.

References

1. B. J. Wagner, P. J. Woodward, and G. E. Dickey, “From the archives of the AFIP. Gestational trophoblastic disease: radiologic-pathologic correlation,” Radiographics, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 131–148, 1996.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
2. S. D. Allen, A. K. Lim, M. J. Seckl, D. M. Blunt, and A. W. Mitchell, “Radiology of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia,” Clinical Radiology, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 301–313, 2006.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
3. B. W. Hancock, “Staging and classification of gestational trophoblastic disease,” Bailliere's Best Practice and Research in Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 869–883, 2003.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
4. S. J. Kim, “Placental site trophoblastic tumour,” Bailliere's Best Practice and Research in Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 969–984, 2003.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
5. K. M. Elsayes, A. T. Trout, A. M. Friedkin et al., “Imaging of the placenta: a multimodality pictorial review,” Radiographics, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1371–1391, 2009.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
6. K. A. Jain, “Gestational trophoblastic disease: pictorial review,” Ultrasound Quarterly, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 245–253, 2005.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
7. C. M. Feltmate, D. R. Genest, L. Wise, M. R. Bernstein, D. P. Goldstein, and R. S. Berkowitz, “Placental site trophoblastic tumor: a 17-year experience at the New England Trophoblastic Disease Center,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 415–419, 2001.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
8. C. Betel, M. Atri, A. Arenson, M. Khalifa, R. Osborne, and G. Tomlinson, “Sonographic diagnosis of gestational trophoblastic disease and comparison with retained products of conception,” Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 985–993, 2006.View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
9. T. Y. Ng and L. C. Wong, “Diagnosis and management of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia,” Bailliere's Best Practice and Research in Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 893–903, 2003.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
10. H. Ngan, H. Bender, J. L. Benedet et al., “Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia, FIGO 2000 staging and classification,” International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 83, supplement 1, pp. 175–177, 2003.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
11. A. K. P. Shanbhogue, N. Lalwani, and C. O. Menias, “Gestational trophoblastic disease,” Radiologic Clinics of North America, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1023–1034, 2013.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
12. K. K. Kani, J. H. Lee, M. Dighe, M. Moshiri, O. Kolokythas, and T. Dubinsky, “Gestatational trophoblastic disease: multimodality imaging assessment with special emphasis on spectrum of abnormalities and value of imaging in staging and management of disease,” Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2012.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
13. S. Chopra, A. S. Lev-Toaff, F. Ors, and D. Bergin, “Adenomyosis: common and uncommon manifestations on sonography and magnetic resonance imaging,” Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 617–627, 2006.View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
14. Q. Zhou, X. Y. Lei, Q. Xie, and J. D. Cardoza, “Sonographic and Doppler imaging in the diagnosis and treatment of gestational trophoblastic disease: a 12-year experience,” Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 15–24, 2005.View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
15. R. Agarwal, S. Strickland, I. A. McNeish et al., “Doppler ultrasonography of the uterine artery and the response to chemotherapy in patients with gestational trophoblastic tumors,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 1142–1147, 2002.View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
16. M. G. Long, J. E. Boultbee, R. Langley, E. S. Newlands, R. H. J. Begent, and K. D. Bagshawe, “Doppler assessment of the uterine circulation and the clinical behaviour of gestational trophoblastic tumours requiring chemotherapy,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 883–887, 1992.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
17. R. Agarwal, V. Harding, D. Short et al., “Uterine artery pulsatility index: a predictor of methotrexate resistance in gestational trophoblastic neoplasia,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 106, no. 6, pp. 1089–1094, 2012.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
18. A. Sita-Lumsden, H. Medani, R. Fisher et al., “Uterine artery pulsatility index improves prediction of methotrexate resistance in women with gestational trophoblastic neoplasia with FIGO score 5-6,” BJOG, vol. 120, no. 8, pp. 1012–1015, 2013.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
19. P. Polat, S. Suma, M. Kantarcý, F. Alper, and A. Levent, “Color Doppler US in the evaluation of uterine vascular abnormalities,” Radiographics, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 47–53, 2002.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
20. S. Umeoka, T. Koyama, K. Togashi, H. Kobayashi, and K. Akuta, “Vascular dilatation in the pelvis: Identification with CT and MR imaging,” Radiographics, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 193–208, 2004.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
21. J. W. Barton, S. M. McCarthy, E. I. Kohorn, L. M. Scoutt, and R. C. Lange, “Pelvic MR imaging findings in gestational trophoblastic disease, incomplete abortion, and ectopic pregnancy: are they specific?” Radiology, vol. 186, no. 1, pp. 163–168, 1993.View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
22. E. I. Kohorn, S. M. McCarthy, and J. W. Barton, “Is magnetic resonance imaging a useful aid in confirming the diagnosis of nonmetastatic gestational trophoblastic neoplasia?” International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 128–134, 1996.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
23. M. Nagayama, Y. Watanabe, A. Okumura, Y. Amoh, S. Nakashita, and Y. Dodo, “Fast MR imaging in obstetrics,” Radiographics, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 563–580, 2002.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
24. H. Hricak, B. E. Demas, C. A. Braga, M. R. Fisher, and M. L. Winkler, “Gestational trophoblastic neoplasm of the uterus: MR assessment,” Radiology, vol. 161, no. 1, pp. 11–16, 1986.View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
25. A. K. P. Lim, D. Patel, N. Patel et al., “Pelvic imaging in gestational trophoblastic neoplasia,” Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist, vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 575–578, 2008.View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
26. Y. Yamashita, M. Torashima, M. Takahashi et al., “Contrast-enhanced dynamic MR imaging of postmolar gestational trophoblastic disease,” Acta Radiologica, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 188–192, 1995.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
27. A. K. P. Lim, R. Agarwal, M. J. Seckl, E. S. Newlands, N. K. Barrett, and A. W. M. Mitchell, “Embolization of bleeding residual uterine vascular malformations in patients with treated gestational trophoblastic tumors,” Radiology, vol. 222, no. 3, pp. 640–644, 2002.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
28. P. Mapelli, G. Mangili, M. Picchio et al., “Role of 18F-FDG PET in the management of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 505–513, 2013.View at Google Scholar
29. R. Cortés-Charry, L. M. Figueira, L. Nieves, and L. Colmenter, “Metastasis detection with 18 FDG-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a report of 2 cases,” Journal of Reproductive Medicine, vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 897–901, 2006.View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
30. T. C. Chang, T. C. Yen, Y. T. Li et al., “The role of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in gestational trophoblastic tumours: a pilot study,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 156–163, 2006.View at Google Scholar
31. T. Dhillon, C. Palmieri, and N. J. Sebire, “Value of whole body 18FDG-PET to identify the active site of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia,” Journal of Reproductive Medicine, vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 879–887, Nov 2006.View at Google Scholar
32. I. Ak and S. Özalp, “Prognostic relevance of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography in molar pregnancy before evacuation,” Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist, vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 441–446, 2009.View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
33. H. Zhuang, A. J. Yamamoto, N. Ghesani, and A. Alavi, “Detection of choriocarcinoma in the lung by FDG positron emission tomography,” Clinical Nuclear Medicine, vol. 26, no. 8, article 723, 2001.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
34. N. Ishizuka, J. W. Brewer, M. M. Hreshchyshyn et al., “Choriocarcinoma,” in Transactions of a Conference of the International Union against Cancer, J. F. Holland and M. M. Hreshchyshyn, Eds., vol. 3 of UICC Monograph Series, Appendix 1, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1967.View at Google Scholar
35. Registration Committee for Trophoblastic Disease of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, “Report of the registration committee for trophoblastic disease,” Acta Obstetricia et Gynaecologica Japonica, vol. 34, pp. 1805–1812, 1982.View at Google Scholar
36. H. C. Song, P. C. Wu, M. Y. Tong, and Y. O. Wang, “Clinical staging,” in Trophoblastic Tumours Diagnosis and Treatment People's Health, pp. 128–129, 1981.View at Google Scholar
37. D. B. Smith, L. Holden, E. S. Newlands, and K. D. Bagshawe, “Correlation between clinical staging (FIGO) and prognostic groups with gestational trophoblastic disease,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 157–160, 1993.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
38. G. T. Ross, D. P. Goldstein, R. Hertz, M. B. Lipsett, and W. D. Odell, “Sequential use of methotrexate and actinomycin D in the treatment of metastatic choriocarcinoma and related trophoblastic diseases in women,” The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 223–229, 1965.View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
39. C. B. Hammond, L. G. Borchert, L. Tyrey, W. T. Creasman, and R. T. Parker, “Treatment of metastatic trophoblastic disease: good and poor prognosis,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 115, no. 4, pp. 451–457, 1973.View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
40. H. E. Dijkema, J. G. Aalders, H. W. A. de Bruijn, R. N. Laurini, and P. H. B. Willemse, “Risk factors in gestational trophoblastic disease, and consequences for primary treatment,” European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 145–152, 1986.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
41. K. D. Bagshawe, “Risk and prognostic factors in trophoblastic neoplasia,” Cancer, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 1373–1385, 1976.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
42. World Health Organization, “Gestational trophoblastic disease,” WHO Technical Report Senes 692, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, 1983.View at Google Scholar
43. E. S. Newlands, “Investigation and treatment of persistent trophoblastic disease and gestational trophoblastic tumours in the UK,” in Gestational Trophoblastic Disease, B. W. Hancock, E. S. Newlands, and R. S. Berkowitz, Eds., pp. 173–190, Chapman & Hall, London, UK, 1997.View at Google Scholar
44. FIGO Oncology Committee Report, “FIGO news,” International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 149–150, 1992.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
45. L. H. Sobin and C. Wittekind, TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours, Wiley-Liss, New York, NY, USA, 1997.
46. J. R. Lurain and E. P. Elfstrand, “Single-agent methotrexate chemotherapy for the treatment of nonmetastatic gestational trophoblastic tumors,” The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 172, no. 2, pp. 574–579, 1995.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
47. J. P. Roberts and J. R. Lurain, “Treatment of low-risk metastatic gestational trophoblastic tumors with single-agent chemotherapy,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 174, no. 6, pp. 1917–1924, 1996.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
48. J. T. Soper, D. L. Clarke-Pearson, A. Berchuck, G. Rodriguez, and C. B. Hammond, “5-Day methotrexate for women with metastatic gestational trophoblastic disease,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 76–79, 1994.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
49. M. Bower, E. S. Newlands, L. Holden et al., “EMA/CO for high-risk gestational trophoblastic tumors: results from a cohort of 272 patients,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 2636–2643, 1997.View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
50. S. J. Kim, S. N. Bae, J. H. Kim et al., “Effects of multiagent chemotherapy and independent risk factors in the treatment of high-risk GTT—25 years experiences of KRI-TRD,” International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. S85–S96, 1998.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
51. R. P. Woolas, M. Bower, E. S. Newlands, M. Seckl, D. Short, and L. Holden, “Influence of chemotherapy for gestational trophoblastic disease on subsequent pregnancy outcome,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 105, no. 9, pp. 1032–1035, 1998.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
52. R. S. Berkowitz, D. P. Goldstein, M. R. Bernstein, and B. Sablinska, “Subsequent pregnancy outcome in patients with molar pregnancy and gestational trophoblastic tumors,” Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist, vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 680–684, 1987.View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
53. J. T. Soper, “Gestational trophoblastic disease,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 176–187, 2006.View at Google Scholar

Print Biographies (8)

Film Biographies (7)

• Michael Jordan: An American Hero (1999)
• Michael Jordan, Above and Beyond (1996)
• Michael Jordan: His Airness (1999)
• Michael Jordan: Air Time (1993)
• Michael Jordan to the Max (2000)
• Michael Jordan: Come Fly with Me (1989)
• 30 for 30: 'Jordan Rides the Bus' Episode #1.18 (2010)

Portrayals (1)

• Michael Jordan: An American Hero (1999)

Interviews (5)

Articles (33)

Pictorials (4)

Magazine Covers (32)